On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and
while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD
check issues a warning for it. (See below.)
Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd
grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not.
Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically?
That looks like a bug in the check code, but wouldn't it be possible to
work around it with something like this?
\examples{
\Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code('
CODE
')}
}
Duncan Murdoch
Thanks, Gabor
In the Rd file:
\Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_examples('
CODE
')}
and pkg::decorate_examples outputs
\examples{
MODIFIED CODE
}
But then:
* checking Rd files ... WARNING
prepare_Rd: ps_cmdline.Rd:36-42: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and
will be dropped
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
