In the help for ?integrate: >When integrating over infinite intervals do so explicitly, rather than just using a large number as the endpoint. This increases the chance of a correct answer – any function whose integral over an infinite interval is finite must be near zero for most of that interval.
I understand that and there are examples such as: ## a slowly-convergent integral integrand <- function(x) {1/((x+1)*sqrt(x))} integrate(integrand, lower = 0, upper = Inf) ## don't do this if you really want the integral from 0 to Inf integrate(integrand, lower = 0, upper = 1000000, stop.on.error = FALSE) #> failed with message ‘the integral is probably divergent’ which gives an error message if stop.on.error = FALSE. But what happens on something like the function below: integrate(function(x) exp(-x), lower = 0, upper =Inf) #> 1 with absolute error < 5.7e-05 integrate(function(x) exp(-x), lower = 0, upper =13000) #> 2.819306e-05 with absolute error < 5.6e-05 *integrate(function(x) exp(-x), lower = 0, upper =13000, stop.on.error = FALSE)#> 2.819306e-05 with absolute error < 5.6e-05* I'm not sure this is a bug or misuse of the function, but I would assume the last integrate to give an error if stop.on.error = FALSE. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel