Logic.Rd has been changed again in r74377. After change:
\item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of
types \code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}},
\code{\link{integer}}) and \code{\link{complex}}), or objects for
It is still inappropriate. As I said before, integer is not double.
Right: numeric includes double and integer
Wrong: double includes numeric and integer
The text mentions "type" and "class". I believe that, in the text, originally,
"type" refers to what is returned by typeof() and "class" refers to what is
returned by class() in R.
When typeof(x) is "double", class(x) is "numeric".
When typeof(x) is "integer", class(x) is "integer".
--------------------------------------------
> wrote:
Subject: Inappropriate parens fix for Logic.Rd
To: r-devel@r-project.org
Date: Saturday, 10 March, 2018, 8:23 AM
Logic.Rd is one of the files changed in r74363.
Before change:
\item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of types
\code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}}), \code{\link{integer}}
and \code{\link{complex}})), or objects for
After change:
\item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of types
\code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}}, \code{\link{integer}}
and \code{\link{complex}})), or objects for
Neither integer nor complex is double.
I think, it should be
\item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of types
\code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}}), \code{\link{integer}}
and \code{\link{complex}}), or objects for
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
