To reduce difficulties for people relying on automated tests set up to build&"check --as-cran" using R-devel (e.g. travis-ci), the default serialization version has been temporarily switched back to 2. Thank you for your patience - according to svn history, the last change of the serialization format happened 16 years ago, and unsurprisingly some practices that developed since did not anticipate such change and have to be adapted.

CRAN is now protected against packages containing serialized files in format 3 (which not only is not readable by 3.4.x and older, but could still change - the 'devel' in 'R-devel'). These new checks have to stay but we are looking at improving package-maintainer-friendliness. It turned out more difficult than just 1-2 days, hence the temporary switch back to version 2.

Best
Tomas

On 01/11/2018 02:47 PM, luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
As things stand now, package tarballs with vignettes that are built
with R-devel will not install in R 3.4.x, so CRAN can't accept them
and someone running R CMD check --as-cran should be told that. A
WARNING is appropriate.

Most likely what will change soon is that build/version.rds will be
saved with serialization version = 2 and this warning will not be
triggered just by having a vignette. It will still be triggered by
data files serialized with R-devel's default version = 3.

Please do remember that the 'devel' in R-devel means exactly that:
things will at times be unstable. There are currently a lot of balls
flying around with changes in R-devel and also Biocontuctor, and the
CRAN maintainers are working hard to keep things all up in the
air. Please be patient.

Best,

luke

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Jim Hester wrote:

This change poses difficulties for automated build systems such as
travis-ci, which is widely used in the R community. In particular
because this is a WARNING and not a NOTE this causes all R-devel
builds with vignettes to fail, as the default settings fail the build
if R CMD check issues a WARNING.

The simplest change would be for R-core to change this message to be a
NOTE rather than a WARNING, the serialization could still be tested
and there would be a check against vignettes built with R-devel, but
it would not cause these builds to fail.

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/01/2018 1:26 PM, Neal Richardson wrote:

Hi,
Since yesterday I'm seeing `R CMD check --as-cran` failures on the
R-devel daily build (specifically, R Under development (unstable)
(2018-01-09 r74100)) for multiple packages:

* checking serialized R objects in the sources ... WARNING
Found file(s) with version 3 serialization:
‘build/vignette.rds’
Such files are only readable in R >= 3.5.0.
Recreate them with R < 3.5.0 or save(version = 2) or saveRDS(version =
2) as appropriate

As far as I can tell, revision 74099

(https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d9530001046a582ff6a43ca834d6c3586abd0a97),
which changes the default serialization format to 3, clashes with
revision 73973
(https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/885764eb74f2211a547b13727f2ecc5470c3dd00),
which checks that serialized R objects are _not_ version 3. It seems
that with the current development version of R, if you `R CMD build`
and then run `R CMD check --as-cran` on the built package, it will
fail.


I think the message basically says:  don't do that.  You should build with
R-release for now.  You always need to check with R-devel, so life is
complicated.

If you build with R-devel without forcing the old format, nobody using
R-release will be able to use your tarball.

Eventually I guess the new format will be accepted by CRAN, but it will
likely be a while:  nobody expects everyone to instantly upgrade to a new R
release, let alone to an unreleased development version.

Presumably that particular file (build/vignette.rds) could be automatically built in the old format for now, but the new format needs testing, so it
makes sense to me to leave it as a default, even if it makes it more
complicated to submit a package to CRAN.

Duncan Murdoch


______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to