I’m not really familiar with conda, but if they’re being packaged together then 
an omp build might be more appropriate. 

Perhaps another point for Juan’s list: whether OpenBLAS is the right choice to 
pair with. The library itself hasn’t produced optimized kernels for any of the 
Intel *Lake chips yet; might be worth considering its near- and long-term 
future (vs something else).

Keith

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 8:24 PM, Benjamin Tyner <bty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Keith. We checked, and indeed libopenblas is not linked against libomp 
> nor libgomp. We suspect this is because we used conda to install R and 
> OpenBLAS. So I guess we should be barking up the conda tree instead?
> 
> By the way, I also noticed on my home machine (Ubuntu), 
> /usr/lib/libopenblas.so.0 is also not linked against those, for what that's 
> worth.
> 
> Regards,
> Ben
> 
> On 01/10/2018 12:04 AM, Keith O'Hara wrote:
>> Check if libopenblas is linked against libomp or libgomp.
>> 
>> I’d be curious to see any errors that arise when an OpenMP version of 
>> OpenBLAS is linked with R.
>> 
>> Keith
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 11:01 PM, Benjamin Tyner <bty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I didn't do the compile; is there a way to check whether that was used? If 
>>> not, I'll inquire with our sysadmin and report back.
>>> 
>>> In any case, my suggestion was motivated by the fact that some parts of R 
>>> use OpenMP while others do not, in the hope that the former could have 
>>> their OpenBLAS omelet without breaking the OpenMP eggs, so to speak.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 01/09/2018 06:41 PM, Keith O'Hara wrote:
>>>> Do those issues still arise when OpenBLAS is compiled with USE_OPENMP=1 ?
>>>> 
>>>> Keith
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 6:03 PM, Benjamin Tyner <bty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please pardon my ignorance, but doesn't OpenBLAS still not always play 
>>>>> nicely with multi-threaded OpenMP? (for example, don't race conditions 
>>>>> sometimes crop up)? If so, it might be nice to have the ability to 
>>>>> temporarily disable multi-threaded OpenMP (effectively: 
>>>>> omp_set_num_threads(1)) for the duration of operations using OpenBLAS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Ben
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Julia using OpenBLAS is *very* reassuring.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I agree that having it included as an options(...) feature should be OK.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017, 3:22 PM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com 
>>>>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /Julia Programming Language uses also OpenBlas, and it is actively 
>>>>>>> />/maintained with bugs being fixed as I have checked it out: 
>>>>>>> />//>/http://www.openblas.net/Changelog.txt />//>/So I still see it ok 
>>>>>>> to be included as an options(...) feature (by default />/off, just for 
>>>>>>> safety), over other Blas libraries. />//>/R could not use Intel MKL for 
>>>>>>> legal reasons (I think), because as long />/that R ships with GPL 
>>>>>>> libraries, shipping R by default with Non-GPL is />/illegal. 
>>>>>>> />//>/Cheers, />/Juan />//>/El 17/12/2017 2:50 a. m., "Avraham Adler" 
>>>>>>> <avraham.adler at gmail.com 
>>>>>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel>> />/escribió: />//>>/On 
>>>>>>> Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Kenny Bell <kmbell56 at gmail.com 
>>>>>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel>> wrote: />>/> It seems 
>>>>>>> like many of the multi-threaded BLASes have some sort of />>/> 
>>>>>>> fundamental problem preventing use in the way Juan suggests: />>/> 
>>>>>>> />>/> - Dirk's vignette states that ATLAS "fixes the number of cores 
>>>>>>> used at />>/> compile-time and cannot vary this setting at run-time", 
>>>>>>> so any />>/> user-friendly implementation for R would have to compile 
>>>>>>> ATLAS for 1-16 />>/> threads to allow the user to switch at run-time. 
>>>>>>> This might dramatically />>/> affect install times. />>/> />>/> - MKL 
>>>>>>> seems like it's been outright rejected in the past based on not />>/> 
>>>>>>> being "free-enough". />>/> />>/> - OpenBLAS causes crashes. />>/> />>/> 
>>>>>>> Has anyone tried ExBLAS for use with R? />>/> />>/> On Sun, Dec 17, 
>>>>>>> 2017 at 1:03 PM, Peter Langfelder < />>/> peter.langfelder at gmail.com 
>>>>>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel>> wrote: />>/> />>/>> I 
>>>>>>> would be very cautious about OpenBLAS in particular... from time to 
>>>>>>> />>/>> time I get complains from users that compiled code calculations 
>>>>>>> in my />>/>> WGCNA package crash or produce wrong answers with large 
>>>>>>> data, and they />>/>> all come from OpenBLAS users. I am yet to 
>>>>>>> reproduce any of their />>/>> crashes when using MKL and ATLAS BLAS 
>>>>>>> implementations. />>/>> />>/>> Just my 2 cents... />>/>> />>/>> Peter 
>>>>>>> />>//>>/I've been building R on Windows 64 bit with OpenBLAS for years 
>>>>>>> and my />>/builds pass check-devel. For a while in the past it failed 
>>>>>>> one check />>/as the tolerance was 5e-5 and with my build of OpenBLAS 
>>>>>>> the error was />>/5.4e-5 or 5.7e-5, but that was changed around R 3.3, 
>>>>>>> if I recall />>/correctly. I provide descriptions here [1], but I 
>>>>>>> haven't gone so far />>/as to post compiled Rblas.dlls just yet. My 
>>>>>>> personal build sets 4 />>/threads when compiling OpenBLAS itself as I'm 
>>>>>>> currently on a quad-core />>/SandyBridge. In tests I ran a few years 
>>>>>>> ago, both single and multi />>/threaded BLAS compile and then can be 
>>>>>>> compiled into R with no issues />>/(on my platforms, at least). Most 
>>>>>>> matrix operations performed better />>/with multi-threaded except for 
>>>>>>> R's eigenvalue decomposition, to the />>/nest of my recollection. 
>>>>>>> />>//>>/Avi />>//>>/[1] 
>>>>>>> https://www.avrahamadler.com/r-tips/build-openblas-for-windows-r64/ 
>>>>>>> />>//>>/______________________________________________ />>/R-devel at 
>>>>>>> r-project.org <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel> mailing 
>>>>>>> list />>/https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel />>//>//
>>>>>>  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>> 
> 
> 

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to