2017-11-30 13:26 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.su...@gmail.com>: > On 30 November 2017 at 11:37, Iñaki Úcar <i.uca...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.su...@gmail.com>: >>> My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it >>> claims, from the documentation: >>> >>> ‘is’: With two arguments, tests whether ‘object’ can be treated as >>> from ‘class2’. >>> >>> With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this >>> object's class. >> >> Note that this is not in the documentation since a year ago. >> > > As far as I understood and gather, starting from methods v3.3.2, the following > new reference is added: > > * Chambers, John M. (2016) Extending R, Chapman & Hall. (Chapters 9 and 10.) > > Pushing that details there, I assume.
Am I supposed to read every reference on a man page just to know what to expect from a function? Iñaki ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
