>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <[email protected]>
>>>>> on Sat, 4 Nov 2017 12:11:48 +0000 writes:
> Removal of
> ans[nas] <- NA
> from the code of function 'ifelse' in R is not committed (yet). Why?
because I have been using it in my version of R-devel for this whole
year, but have forgotten to commit it.
Thank you for the reminder. I have committed it now :
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r73681 | maechler | 2017-11-06 15:39:20 +0100 (Mon, 06 Nov 2017) | 3 lines
drop extraneous line, as suggested by Suharto Anggono, and as "promised" on
R-devel list, Nov 26, 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Mon, 28/11/16, Martin Maechler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Rd] ifelse() woes ... can we agree on a ifelse2() ?
> To: "Suharto Anggono" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Date: Monday, 28 November, 2016, 10:00 PM
>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org>
>>>>> on Sat, 26 Nov 2016 17:14:01 +0000 writes:
> ...
>> On current 'ifelse' code in R:
>> * The part
>> ans[nas] <- NA
>> could be omitted because NA's are already in place.
>> If the part is removed, variable 'nas' is no longer used.
> I agree that this seems logical. If I apply the change, R's own
> full checks do not seem affected, and I may try to commit that
> change and "wait and see".
> ...
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
