> But, how you propose a warning-to-error transition should be made > without wreaking havoc? Just flip the switch in R-devel and see CRAN > and Bioconductor packages break overnight? Particularly Bioconductor > devel might become non-functional (since at times it requires > R-devel). For my own code / packages, I would be able to handle such > a change, but I'm completely out of control if one of the package I'm > depending on does not provide a quick fix (with the only option to > remove package tests for those dependencies).
Generally, a package can not be on CRAN if it has any warnings, so I don't think this change would have any impact on CRAN packages. Isn't this also true for bioconductor? Hadley -- http://hadley.nz ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
