Hi Martin, Sorry about the confusion. Yes, my eyes were playing tricks on me during the copy-&-paste process :) Thank you for helping so quickly with this. I am not part of the R core group to make changes to R, but I've studied the R source code - and that of quite a few BioConductor packages - for many years. So I was just posting to help with why it was happening to focus the root-cause for a fix, and how to find a possible work-around for it.
Thank you, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Martin Maechler [mailto:maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 2:57 AM To: Paul Grosu Cc: r-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] as.data.frame and illegal row.names argument (bug in package:DoE.wrapper?) >>>>> Paul Grosu <pgr...@gmail.com> >>>>> on Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:35:49 -0500 writes: > Hi Bill, > The thing is that is happening here is the specific > instance of as.data.frame that is being run, which in this > instance switch between as.data.frame.matrix() and as.data.frame.matrix(). (This must be another typo i.e. "cut/n/paste forgot to modify" lapsus; you probably meant *.vector in the 2nd case). I'm pretty sure Bill was not asking *why* this happens {he would easily find out if he wanted} but reporting two (potential) bugs: - one in R [not reporting erronous as.data.frame() usage] - one in DoE.wrapper I'm going to look into the R one, which is indeed in the as.data.frame.vector() method, as you've noted. -- Martin Maechler ETH Zurich ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
