It seems odd/inconvenient to me that the "ignore.environment" argument
of identical() only applies to closures (which I read as 'functions' --
someone can enlighten me about the technical differences between
functions and closures if they like -- see below for consequences of my
confusion). This is certainly not a bug, it's clearly documented, but
it seems like a design flaw. It would certainly be convenient to be
able to ignore differences in environments when comparing complex
objects with lots of deeply nested formula and terms objects with
environments ...
Can anyone suggest a reason for this design?
Example:
> f1 <- formula()
> f2 <- formula()
> environment(f2) <- new.env()
> identical(f1,f2)
[1] FALSE
> identical(f1,f2,ignore.environment=TRUE)
[1] FALSE
Actually, maybe I don't understand how this is supposed to work since I
thought this would be TRUE:
> f1 <- function() {}
> f2 <- function() {}
> environment(f1) <- new.env()
> environment(f2) <- new.env()
> identical(f1,f2,ignore.environment=TRUE) ## FALSE
Maybe the problem *is* that I don't know the difference between a
function and a closure ... ?
Ben Bolker
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
