What other packages do you have loaded? Perhaps a BioConductor one that loads
S4Vectors that announces upon load:
Creating a generic function for 'nchar' from package 'base' in package
'S4Vectors'
Maybe a red herring...
~Malcolm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Duncan
> Murdoch
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 6:57 PM
> To: Matt Dowle <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Error generated by .Internal(nchar) disappears when
> debugging
>
> On 05/10/2015 7:24 PM, Matt Dowle wrote:
> > Joris Meys <jorismeys <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a puzzling problem related to nchar. In R 3.2.1, the internal
> > nchar
> >> gained an extra argument (see
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2015/000586.html)
> >>
> >> I've been testing code using the package copula, and at home I'm
> >> still running R 3.2.0 (I know, I know...). When trying the following
> >> code, I
> > got
> >> an error:
> >>
> >>> library(copula)
> >>> fgmCopula(0.8)
> >> Error in substr(sc[i], 2, nchar(sc[i]) - 1) :
> >> 4 arguments passed to .Internal(nchar) which requires 3
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Joris
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN
> > of any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my
> > answer here is correct please :
> > http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310
>
> Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of hard to
> say.
>
> I would have guessed that a change to the internal signature of the C code
> underlying nchar() wouldn't have any effect on a package that called the R
> nchar() function.
>
> When I put together my own example (a tiny package containing a function
> calling nchar(), built to .zip using R 3.2.2, installed into R 3.2.0), it
> confirmed
> my guess.
>
> On the other hand, if some package is calling the .Internal function
> directly, I'd
> expect that to break. Packages shouldn't do that.
>
> So I'd say there's been no evidence posted of a problem in R here, though
> there may be problems in some of the packages involved. I'd welcome an
> example that provided some usable evidence.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
