On 05/07/2015 12:53 PM, Richard Cotton wrote: > One piece of feedback that I received at useR was that the assertive > package is getting too big, and should be broken down into smaller > pieces. > > I want to split the functionality into assertive.base, > assertive.types, and a few others, then have the assertive package as > a virtual package (suggestions for better terminology welcomed) that > just imports and reexports the contents of the underlying pieces. > > That way end-users can can still type library(assertive) and have the > same behaviour as before, and package developers who worry about > having lightweight dependencies can just use the parts that they need. > > Before I do the refactoring, I wanted to check that it is OK to have a > package without any of its own content (other than vignettes) on CRAN. > Is it OK? >
I think you're writing to the wrong place. This sounds like a question for the R-pkg-devel list, or if you don't get an answer there, c...@r-project.org. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
