What does this have to do with this (or any R) list?

Bioconductor has its own support arrangements.

On 18/11/2014 17:00, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
Hi,

I understand ShortRead::FastqStreamer will read chunks in parallel depending on 
the value of ShortRead:::.set_omp_threads

I see this discussed here:  
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2013-May/004355.html and nowhere else.

It probably should be documented in ShortRead.

Possibly this has already changed for I am using still R 3.1.0.   I thought I'd 
check.

Oh, and, in my hands/hardware, the value of this FastqStreamer's use of 
srapply's parallelization is negligible, at least if the consumer of successive 
yields is in the main process.  I see that the new bpiterate appears to take 
advantage of yielding in forked processes, which sounds promising.  Is that the 
idea?

Looking forward....

Malcolm Cook

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



--
Brian D. Ripley,                  rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford
1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to