What does this have to do with this (or any R) list? Bioconductor has its own support arrangements.
On 18/11/2014 17:00, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
Hi, I understand ShortRead::FastqStreamer will read chunks in parallel depending on the value of ShortRead:::.set_omp_threads I see this discussed here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2013-May/004355.html and nowhere else. It probably should be documented in ShortRead. Possibly this has already changed for I am using still R 3.1.0. I thought I'd check. Oh, and, in my hands/hardware, the value of this FastqStreamer's use of srapply's parallelization is negligible, at least if the consumer of successive yields is in the main process. I see that the new bpiterate appears to take advantage of yielding in forked processes, which sounds promising. Is that the idea? Looking forward.... Malcolm Cook ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
-- Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford 1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
