----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gábor Csárdi" <csardi.ga...@gmail.com> > To: "Simon Urbanek" <simon.urba...@r-project.org> > Cc: r-devel@r-project.org > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:42:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Rd] R-3.1.0 OSX Snow Leopard installs old binary > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Simon Urbanek > <simon.urba...@r-project.org>wrote: > > > > > On Apr 17, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Gábor Csárdi <csardi.ga...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, I am not sure why this happens, but apparently an old > > > binary is > > > installed by default. Downloading and installing the new binary > > > by hand > > > works fine. > > > > > > > I think you may be misinterpreting - the is no binary for igraph > > 0.7 > > because it fails make check, > > > Btw. it fails R CMD check (there is no make check afaik) because it > suggests a BioC package (graph), that is not available.
The graph package is available: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/graph.html ...but maybe not installed on the CRAN build machine. All of this would make more sense if the OP was using the Mavericks build of R because we don't yet have BioC binary packages for that, but his original sessionInfo() showed that he was using the Snow Leopard build. > Can CRAN > packages > not depend on BioC packages any more? > I think they can. graph is in igraph's Suggests. If CRAN packages could not depend on BioC packages, I would imagine that igraph would be removed from CRAN until it got rid of that dependency. Dan > Thanks, Gabor > > [...] > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
