On 15/04/2014 8:12 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 15 Apr 2014, at 13:14 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14/04/2014, 10:23 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Thanks for your confirmation on this.
>>
>> I normally do not use R CMD Sweave, as I too run under ESS in normal day to 
day operations. This finding was a quirk of having a particular Rnw document that I 
occasionally run using R CMD Sweave and I had done so over the weekend, realizing 
this behavior.
>
> This sounds like an argument for dropping R CMD Sweave, rather than fixing 
it.  The bug was introduced in July, 2013, and nobody noticed it because so few 
people use that feature, and apparently nobody who does use it bothers to test 
pre-release versions.
>

I'd say that that cat is out of the bag. There are probably umpteen documents around 
suggesting "R CMD Sweave". As people use Sweave only sporadically, it could 
take years before the old usage got stamped out. And anyways, the command format is the 
obvious way to generate documents in scripts and makefiles, isn't it?


I use Rscript, and I expect most others do too, but I was wrong about how long this went unreported. Martin Morgan reported it in February in R-devel and I didn't notice. He even gave a link to it in a message in March on another topic; I replied to the March message, but didn't follow the link.

We discourage people from using bugs.r-project.org for pre-release issues; perhaps we shouldn't do that.

Duncan Murdoch

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to