While we are here, how about an is.sorted() function? It is trivial and helps readability a lot imho. Then one does not have to write things like
stopifnot(!is.unsorted(x)) but can write stopifnot(is.sorted(x)) instead. Gabor On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Patrick Burns <pbu...@pburns.seanet.com> wrote: > > I've just realized that it could be handy > to have a 'decreasing' argument in 'is.unsorted'. > > And I'm cheekily hoping someone else will > implement it. > > It is easy enough to work around (with 'rev'), > but would be less hassle with an argument. > The case I have in mind uses 'is.unsorted' in > 'stopifnot'. > > Pat > > -- > Patrick Burns > pbu...@pburns.seanet.com > twitter: @burnsstat @portfolioprobe > http://www.portfolioprobe.com/blog > http://www.burns-stat.com > (home of: > 'Impatient R' > 'The R Inferno' > 'Tao Te Programming') > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
