Thanks Michael, somewhat embarrassingly, I had forgotten that a package can refer to any of *its own packages*. So I don't need analogue:::foo.bar as that is being called from a function in the analogue namespace.
Cheers, G On 23 August 2013 09:27, R. Michael Weylandt <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:15, Gavin Simpson <ucfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear List, >> >> I'm in the process of making tweaks to my various R packages following >> changes in r-devel for package checks. I'm wondering about the one use >> of ::: in one of my packages. I am arranging for a call to a >> non-exported S3 method via do.call. For this I need the arguments of >> the function and hence I was doing >> >> Args <- head(formals(analogue:::wa.default), -1) >> >> Following the recent thread on legitimate uses of ::: I think the >> above is both acceptable and won't generate a Note now with R CMD >> check following a recent change to that code. But is there a better >> way to get the formal arguments of a non-exported S3 method? >> > > Something like (untested) > > formalsS3 <- function(...) formals(getS3method(...)) > > might work. I haven't checked to see how R CMD check feels about > getS3method() though. > > Michael > > >> Thanks. >> >> G >> >> -- >> Gavin Simpson >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Gavin Simpson, PhD ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
