Hi Dan,
Thank you!  I dig up a Mac at work and recreate this.

Kevin


On 2013-03-09, at 5:52 PM, Dan Tenenbaum <dtene...@fhcrc.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Hendricks
> <kevin.hendri...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> One last quick question ... does anyone archive older CRAN package check 
>> summaries?  I searched the web but could not find any.  My package was 
>> archived in February of this year so any package check summary from earlier 
>> than that should help me figure out what is broken on MacOSX or Windows.
> 
> FWIW, it fails check on my Mac as follows:
> 
> * checking examples ... ERROR
> Running examples in 'Rigroup-Ex.R' failed
> The error most likely occurred in:
> 
>> ### Name: igroupAlls
>> ### Title: calculates logical All for small integer groups of logical
>> ###   vectors
>> ### Aliases: igroupAlls
>> ### Keywords: utilities
>> 
>> ### ** Examples
>> 
>> y <- rnorm(100)
>> i <- rep(1:25,4)
>> x <- (y > 1.0)
>> alls <- igroupAlls(x,i)
> Error in .External("igroupFuns", x, i, R_IGFMINS, na.rm, PACKAGE = "Rigroup") 
> :
>  Incorrect number of arguments (4), expecting 1 for 'igroupFuns'
> Calls: igroupAlls -> .External
> Execution halted
> 
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On 2013-03-09, at 4:38 PM, Kevin Hendricks <kevin.hendri...@sympatico.ca> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> Thanks for that info.  It works/builds without error or warnings on my 
>>> RedHat Enterprise 6  with R 2.15.2 version which I use but must be broken 
>>> somehow on later versions.  I will see if I can find the autobuild warnings 
>>> error report someplace.
>>> 
>>> Kevin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>> On 2013-03-09, at 4:00 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <h...@biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Kevin Hendricks
>>>> <kevin.hendri...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Who should I ask about my package Rigroup_0.83 being moved to Archive 
>>>>> status on CRAN and no longer available via install.package?  I have no 
>>>>> problems with the move if this was simply because of low demand.  
>>>>> However, if there was a build issue with the newest releases that caused 
>>>>> problems, I would be happy to address it.  I'll just ask my students to 
>>>>> install it from my own locally hosted source archive.
>>>> 
>>>> Most likely yourself; from the 'CRAN Repository Policy'
>>>> [http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html]:
>>>> 
>>>> "Packages will not normally be removed from CRAN: however, they may be
>>>> archived, including at the maintainer's request.
>>>> 
>>>> Packages for which R CMD check gives an ‘ERROR’ when a new R x.y.0
>>>> version is released will be archived (or in exceptional circumstances
>>>> updated by the CRAN team) unless the maintainer has set a firm
>>>> deadline for an upcoming update (and keeps to it).
>>>> 
>>>> Maintainers will be asked to update packages which show any warnings
>>>> or significant notes, especially at around the time of a new x.y.0
>>>> release. Packages which are not updated are liable to be archived."
>>>> 
>>>> /Henrik
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> 

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to