Am 15.01.2013 um 01:11 schrieb Brian Lee Yung Rowe <r...@muxspace.com>:
> > On Jan 14, 2013, at 6:32 PM, oliver <oli...@first.in-berlin.de> wrote: > >> BTW: I looked up the string "wish list" in some of the mentioned docs >> (mentioned in this thread) >> but did not found it. >> Can you please point me to it directly? >> Googling for "R wish list" brings me links to a producer of toys. >> >> Or did you mean I should ask R users for their wishes??! >> >> (Some R users - on this list - asked for Julia language as a speedup >> alternative for R a while agoâ¦) > > Is this what you're looking for: http://developer.r-project.org/ (see TODO > lists) Ah, yes,there are TODO lists, thanks. This is at least some kind of thing yi was looking for. But these are personell TODO lists. Are their any goals for R as whole project? > > >> All in all it seems like no special things need to be done. >> The FSF for example has a page where they ask for support in certain areas, >> so, this looks rather urgent. >> R seems not to have such urgent needs for support.... > > How about cleaning up some of the documentation/wiki pages? I'm not a friend of seperating design, coding, documentation, ... IMHO this should be something that is not seperated. And I also think, that the way, R packages will be written (code as well as documentation together) uses the same kind of philosophy. I was very happy about this close relation between code and documentation,mthat is necessary to wrte a package. I thought the same holds true for R project as a whole. So I maybe was wrong with this assumption. Ciao, Olver [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
