I noticed some undocumented and inconsistent behavior in device_Raster when a
plot is produced with reflected axes such as:
image(volcano, xlim = c(1,0), useRaster = TRUE)
image(volcano, ylim = c(1,0), useRaster = TRUE)
The `pdf` device will perform horizontal and vertical reflections, while
`quartz` will ignore the transformations when plotting to the screen, but
when plotting to a file, `quartz(file = 'test.pdf', type = 'pdf')`, it will
produce horizontal reflections and ignore vertical ones.
When the `xlim` or `ylim` is reversed, negative widths and heights are
passed to the C function `device_Raster`, which is not a behavior documented
in `R_ext/GraphicsDevice.h`. Also, the values of `x` and `y` passed to
`device_Raster` will be shifted by the width or height of the image such
that the coordinates no longer reference the bottom-left corner of the image
as `R_ext/GraphicsDevice.h` says they should.
Given the inconsistencies in documentation and behavior, I am wondering what
the intended behavior of `device_Raster` is in this situation.
Thanks!
-Charlie
-----
Charlie Sharpsteen
Undergraduate-- Environmental Resources Engineering
Humboldt State University
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Inconsistencies-in-device-Raster-when-axes-are-reflected-tp4286320p4286320.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
