Hi,
I've got a C extension structured roughly like:
package/
src/
Makevars
foo.c
some-lib/...
some-other-lib/..
where foo.c and Makevars define dependencies on some-lib and
some-other-lib. Currently I'm having
Makevars configure;make install some-lib and some-other-lib into a local
build directory, which produces
shard libraries that ultimately I reference for foo.o in PKG_LIBS.
I'm concerned about distribution. I've setup the appropriate magic with
rpath for the packages .so (meaning
that when the final .so is produced the dynamic libraries dependencies on
some-lib and some-other-lib
will prefer the location built in src/some-lib/... and
src/some-other-lib/... But does this preclude me from
being able to distribute a binary package? If I do want to build a binary
distribution, is there a way I can
package up everything needed, not just the resulting .so?
Or, are there better ways to bundle extension-specific third party
dependencies? ;) I'd rather not have
my users have to install obscure libraries globally on their systems.
Thanks!
Tyler
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
