On 29/09/2011 11:42 AM, Suraj Gupta wrote:
Folks,
Per a post to StackOverflow, I'm looking for an opinion on whether something
should be documented:
When adding a named item to a list, its guaranteed that the item will be
added to the end of the list.
I'd say not. There's an easy way to guarantee the order: instead of using
mylist$newname <- 1
use
mylist <- c(mylist, newname=1)
The former construction doesn't necessarily put it last, only when
newname is a new name. The latter guarantees that it goes last.
Currently, you can do something like this:
x <- list(1) # one element list
x[[10]] <- 10 # grows x to a 10 element list, filling in NULLs in
positions 2 to 9
x$newname <- 11 # puts the newname in the 11th position
It's not obvious to me that the newname shouldn't go into the 2nd
position (if I ignore the comments). I wouldn't want to rule that out
as a future change.
Duncan Murdoch
SO post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7599349/adding-named-item-to-list-guaranteed-to-append-to-end-of-list/7599610#7599610
This is my first email to r-devel, so I hope this is an appropriate
question.
-Suraj
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
