If this message is garbled for anyone else, the original question on
stackoverflow is here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5841339/using-notation-for-reference-class-methods
Hadley
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chad Goymer <chad.goy...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to use methods for reference classes via the notation
> "[[...]]" (X[["doSomething"]] rather than X$doSomething), but it failed to
> work. However, I did find that if you use the usual "$" notation first,
> "[[...]]" can be used afterwards. The following simple example illustrates
> the point:
>> setRefClass("Number", + fields = list(+ value = "numeric"+ ),+
>> methods = list(+ addOne = function() {+ value <<- value + 1+
>> }+ )+ )> X <- new("Number", value = 1)> X[["value"]][1] 1
>> X[["addOne"]]()Error: attempt to apply non-function> class(X[["addOne"]]) #
>> NULL[1] "NULL"
>> class(X$addOne)[1] "refMethodDef"attr(,"package")[1] "methods"
>> X[["addOne"]]()> X[["value"]][1] 2> class(X[["addOne"]])[1]
>> "refMethodDef"attr(,"package")[1] "methods"
> Is this a bug?
> Chad Goymer
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
--
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
