A user sent me a query on survreg, which when boiled down is a request to drop unused levels when setting up the X matrix. I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other, but am loath to make the change: I expect that code somewhere will break, perhaps a lot, when the length of the coefficients changes.
On the other hand, at some point this change was made to lm(). Does the R core have an opinion on which is better, or a pointer to discussion that underlied the change to lm()? It could be enough to push me over the edge. It would affect survreg, coxph, survfit, survdiff, coxme, ... Terry Therneau ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
