Hello,
When running tools::checkRd() on a single .Rd file, should I expect the
output to be the same as that generated by R CMD check when it checks .Rd
files?
R CMD check finds the following warning:
* checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING
> Assignments in \usage in documentation object 'ilm':
> result <- ilm(celfiles, threshold = 350, satLim = 10000)
> Functions with \usage entries need to have the appropriate \alias
> entries, and all their arguments documented.
> The \usage entries must correspond to syntactically valid R code.
> See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R
> Extensions'.
That warning is in the file man/ilm.Rd.
When I check that file in R, it returns no output:
> library(tools)
> tools::checkRd("ilm.Rd")
>
I'm running the same R in both cases.
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.13.0 Under development (unstable) (2011-03-12 r54757)
Platform: x86_64-pc-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252
[2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
[3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
[4] LC_NUMERIC=C
[5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252
attached base packages:
[1] tools stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
[8] base
Thanks
Dan
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
