Hi
On 15/02/2011 8:11 a.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
Paul Murrell<p.murrell<at> auckland.ac.nz> writes:
Hi
On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on
the fifth (and subsequent) calls.
Great. Thanks for checking.
Paul
That's great.
Just a little bump: I would encourage Simon (in his copious spare
time), or other interested members of R-core, to decide on a good
name for the argument (as a reminder, I prefer
'method=c("raster","image")'). Furthermore, I would strongly
encourage that "raster" be made the default behavior for the
development release of R ...
Unfortunately I just encountered a speed bump today - I had no idea
that the Windows device doesn't even support transparent pixels. That
needs to be fixed before we can make it the default...
See the table at the bottom of
http://developer.r-project.org/Raster/raster-RFC.html for the full list
of limitations.
Paul
Cheers, Simon
______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org
mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
Dr Paul Murrell
Department of Statistics
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland
New Zealand
64 9 3737599 x85392
p...@stat.auckland.ac.nz
http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
