?ReferenceClasses says "Reference methods can not themselves be
generic functions; if you want additional function-based method
dispatch, write a separate generic function and call that from the
method". So I think you'd need to take that approach in your
"initialize" method.
Hope this helps,
Jon
On 28 October 2010 18:25, Daniel Lee <bear...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Thank you. Your example really clarifies what the $initialize(...) function
> is supposed to do.
>
> Do you know if there is a straightforward way to dispatch the $new(...)
> method based on the signature of the arguments? I am thinking along the
> lines of S4 methods with valid signatures.
>
> Thanks again for the example.
>
>
> On 10/28/2010 12:12 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>>
>> Sorry - you don't need to assign the value of initFields(). I was
>> going to do it in two lines but then realised one was enough... :)
>>
>> TestClass<- setRefClass ("TestClass",
>> fields = list (text = "character"),
>> methods = list (
>> initialize = function (text) {
>> initFields(text=paste(text,"\n")) },
>> print = function () { cat(text) } )
>> )
>>
>> All the best,
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> On 28 October 2010 15:13, Daniel Lee<bear...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it possible to override the $new(...) in the reference class
>>> generator? I
>>> have tried adding a "new" method to the methods of the class, but that is
>>> obviously not correct. I have also tried adding it to the class
>>> generator,
>>> but the class generator still uses the default constructor.
>>>
>>> As a simple example, this is the current interface:
>>> TestClass<- setRefClass ("TestClass",
>>> fields = list (text = "character"),
>>> methods = list (
>>> print = function () {cat(text)})
>>> )
>>> test<- TestClass$new (text="Hello World")
>>> test$print()
>>>
>>> I would like to override $new(...) to be something like (add a "\n" to
>>> the
>>> end of the input, no need to specify input fields):
>>> TestClass$methods (new = function (text) {
>>> text<- paste (text, "\n")
>>> methods:::new (def, text=text)
>>> })
>>>
>>> The constructor would then be:
>>> test<- TestClass$new ("Hello World")
>>>
>>> This is a subtle, but useful change. I have also tried adding to
>>> TestClass a
>>> method $newInstance(text), but that was not successful. If this is not
>>> possible, could we consider augmenting the Reference Class interface to
>>> include constructors?
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>>
>
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
