Hi,

Sure. I could and I would provide a patch. Since this is more of a "nice to have", I wanted to first find out whether others would find it useful, and also if such a patch would have chances to get accepted by one of R-core members.

Sometimes patches I or others provide upfront are not accepted. I'm not complaining about it, it is always an opportunity to learn something ...

Romain

Le 30/05/10 14:49, Wolfgang Huber a écrit :

Hi Romain,

not that I have any authority here, but wouldn't your suggestion (which
I think could be very useful) be more powerful if it were accompanied by
a patch that could be applied to the R sources?

Best wishes
Wolfgang Huber
EMBL
http://www.embl.de/research/units/genome_biology/huber




On 28/05/10 19:25, Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,

I often find myself writing code like :

if( require( "foo" ) && compareVersion( packageDescription(
"foo")[["Version"]], "2.1" ) < 0 ){

# code that uses version 2.1 of foo
} else {
stop( "could not load version >= 2.1 of foo" )
}



Would it make sense to include something like this in require, library,
etc ...

require( "foo (>= 2.1)" )
require( "foo", minimal.version = "2.1" )

I know we can use Depends: foo (>= 2.1) in a package DESCRIPTION file,
but that does not work for loose dependencies, when package "bar" works
better with "foo" but can still work fine without, or when not making a
package.

Romain


--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://bit.ly/99bz5D : highlight 0.1-9
|- http://bit.ly/9CQ66r : RMetrics 2010
`- http://bit.ly/bklUXt : RcppArmadillo 0.2.1


______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to