JN
______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
License filters will work for me. My offer stands to help on
documentation,or to act as a "stooge" to test tools in this area. Thanks
to those who responded. And for myself, "GPL compatible" was my intended
expression.
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Duncan Murdoch
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Prof. John C Nash
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Peter Dalgaard
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Robert Gentleman
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Gabor Grothendieck
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Kurt Hornik
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R spencerg
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R John C Nash
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R rudjer
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Douglas Bates
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Simon Urbanek
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Kurt Hornik
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Romain Francois
- Re: [Rd] Non-GPL packages for R Michael Dewey
