On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sundar Dorai-Raj<sdorai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just noticed the following in update.formula and I'm wondering if
> this behavior is the intention of the developers. Here's an example:
>
> update(`a: b` ~ x, ~ . + y)
>
> Note now that the response has no backticks and is interpreted as a:b
> (i.e. ":" is now an operator). This is because in update.formula the
> call to terms.formula uses simplify = TRUE. I'm working with data that
> has a lot of colons in their names and for reporting purposes I don't
> want to use make.names to avoid this situation. I do have a solution
> which simply avoids using update.formula, but I wonder if the
> developers would consider removing the "simplify" argument and allow
> it to be passed through "...", which is currently ignored by
> update.formula. Alternatively, add a simplify=TRUE to the
> update.formula call, which can manually be set to FALSE by the user.
>
> I would love to hear any comments or criticisms of my findings.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --sundar
>
Forgot my version info
> version
_
platform x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
arch x86_64
os linux-gnu
system x86_64, linux-gnu
status
major 2
minor 9.1
year 2009
month 06
day 26
svn rev 48839
language R
version.string R version 2.9.1 (2009-06-26)
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
