is.integer() is one of those functions with a name that can be confusing -- it looks at the underlying storage type of its argument (e.g., integer, floating point, character, etc.) not at the value stored in the argument.

So, the type of behavior you see is this:

> is.integer(1)
[1] FALSE
> is.integer(as.integer(1))
[1] TRUE
> is.integer(as.integer(1) * 1.0)
[1] FALSE
> is.integer(as.integer(NA))
[1] TRUE
>

Careful reading of ?is.integer does tell you this, but I wouldn't accuse that help page of making such information blatantly obvious to new users of R.

To test whether a value is an integer value, you can so something like this:

> is.wholenumber <- function(x, tolerance = .Machine$double.eps^0.5) return(abs(x - round(x)) < tolerance)
> is.wholenumber(1)
[1] TRUE
> is.wholenumber(seq(1,5,by=0.5))
[1]  TRUE FALSE  TRUE FALSE  TRUE FALSE  TRUE FALSE  TRUE
>

The 'tolerance' part is to allow for minor deviations that might be due to floating point representation issues, e.g., on my computer 1/49 * 49 does not result in a value that is exactly equal to 1:

> 1/49 * 49 - 1
[1] -1.110223e-16
> is.wholenumber(1/49 * 49)
[1] TRUE
> is.wholenumber(1/49 * 49, tol=0)
[1] FALSE
>

-- Tony Plate

[email protected] wrote:
Full_Name: Mauricio
Version: 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
OS:  i486-pc-linux-gnu
Submission from: (NULL) (193.205.203.3)


This is a very simple function that seems not to be working, according to the
definition given by '?is.integer'.

I checked in the Bug Tracking page at http://bugs.R-project.org/, but I didn't
find any related message.

The possible problem is:


is.integer(1)
[1] FALSE

and 1 is obviously an integer value.


I would really appreciate if you could clarify if this is really a bug or not.

Thanks in advance,

Mauricio

version
_ platform i486-pc-linux-gnu arch i486 os linux-gnu system i486, linux-gnu status major 2 minor 9.0 year 2009 month 04 day 17 svn rev 48333 language R version.string R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to