Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
> Berwin A Turlach wrote:
>
>
>> This is similar to the discussion what value i should have in the
>> following C snippet:
>> i = 0;
>> i += i++;
>>
>>
>
>
> in fact, your example is useless because the result here is clearly
> specified by the semantics (as far as i know -- prove me wrong). you
> lookup i (0) and i (0) (the order does not matter here), add these
> values (0), assign to i (0), and increase i (1).
>
i'm happy to prove myself wrong. the c programming language, 2nd ed. by
ritchie and kernigan, has the following discussion:
"
One unhappy situation is typified by the statement
a[i] = i++;
The question is whether the subscript is the old value of i or the new.
Compilers can interpret
this in different ways, and generate different answers depending on
their interpretation. The
standard intentionally leaves most such matters unspecified.
"
vQ
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
