G'day Robin, On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:10:45 +0000 Robin Hankin <rk...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> I am preparing a number of vignettes that require a very long time to > process with Sweave. The longest one takes 10 hours. Is the sum of all chunks taking this time? Or is it mostly the code in only a view chunks? And if so, are there chunks following that depend on the result of these time-intensive chunks? I wonder if it is feasible to construct your vignette according to the lines. 1) have a file, say, vignette1.Rnw.in that contains: -------------------- #ifdef BUILDVERSION you may want to try the commands \begin{Sinput} > command1 > command2 \end{Sinput} but be aware that his might take a long time. #else Now we run the commands <<>>= command1 command2 @ #endif -------------------------- 2) Now construct a Makefile that, using a preprocesser like cpp, produces vignette1.Rnw from vignette1.Rnw.in using the first version before an "R CMD build" but otherwise (for your own testing) the second version. Using .Rbuildignore, you can ensure that vignett1.Rnw.in would not be distributed. > I love the weaver package! Thanks for pointing this package out. I was aware of cacheSweave, but that package seems to require that each chunk has a label which I find kind of inconvenient. weaver does not seem to have such a requirement. Cheers, Berwin ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel