On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Høyer Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's confusing! In what situations is x a matrix but does not have >> a dim attribute? > > That was my point. I don't find it logical that > is.matrix(a) gives FALSE but > is.matrix(t( t(a) )) gives TRUE. > > I also think it would be more logical that > a=c(1,1,2) > dim(a) gives 3 1 instead of NULL,
In R t(t(a)) != a, because a vector is different to a 1d matrix. This is different to mathematical convention - you could argue that it would have been wise to stick with convention, but there are some good reasons for treating vectors differently to 1d matrices, and its too late to change now. Note that the following are all different in R: a <- 1:3 b <- array(1:3, 3) c <- array(1:3, c(3,1)) d <- array(1:3, c(3,1,1)) e <- array(1:3, c(3,1,1,1)) f <- array(1:3, c(3,1,1,1,1)) Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
