On Oct 28, 2008, at 6:26 , Fán Lóng wrote:
Hi guys,
Hey guy :)
I've got a question about the API mkchar(). I have met some
difficulty in parsing utf-8 string to mkchar() in R-2.7.0.
There is no mkchar() in R. Did you perhaps mean mkChar()?
I was intending to parse an utf-8 string str_jan (some Japanese
characters such asふ, whose utf-8 code is E381B5
There is no such "UTF-8" code. I'm not sure if you meant Unicode, but
that would be \u3075 (Hiragana hu) for that character. The UTF-8
encoding of that character is a three-byte sequence 0xe3 0x81 0xb5 if
that's what you meant.
) to R API SEXP
mkChar(const char *name) , we only need to create the SEXP using the
string that we parsed.
Unfortunately, I found when parsing the variable str_jan, R will
automatically convert the str_jan according to the current locale
setting,
That is not true - it will be kept as-is regardless of the encoding.
Note that mkChar(x) is equivalent to mkCharCE(x, CE_NATIVE); No
conversion takes place when the string is created, but you have told R
that it is in the native encoding. If that is not true (which is your
case probably isn't), all bets are off since you're lying to R ;).
so only in the English locale could the function work correctly,
under other locale, such as Japanese or Chinese, the string will be
convert incorrectly.
That is clearly a nonsense since the encoding has nothing to do with
the locale language itself (Japanese, Chinese, ..). We are talking
about the encoding (note that both English and Japanese locales can
use UTF-8 encoding, but don't have to). I think you'll need to get the
concepts right here - for each string you must define the encoding in
order to be able to reproduce the unicode sequence that the string
represents. At this point it has nothing to do with the language.
As a matter of fact, those utf-8 code already is Unicode string, and
don't need to be converted at all.
I also tried to use the SEXP Rf_mkCharCE(const char *, cetype_t);,
Parsing the CE_UTF8 as the argument of cetype_t, but the result is
worse. It returned the result as ucs code, an kind of Unicode under
windows platform.
Well, that's exactly what you want, isn't it? The string is correctly
flagged as UTF-8 so R is finally able to find out what exactly is
represented by that string. However, your locale apparently doesn't
support such characters so it cannot be displayed. If you use a locale
that supports it, it works just fine, for example if you use local
with SJIS encoding R will still know how to convert it from UTF-8 to
SJIS *for display*. The actual string is not touched.
Here is a small piece of code that shows you the difference between
native encoding and UTF8-strings:
#include <R.h>
#include <Rinternals.h>
SEXP me() {
const char c[] = { 0xe3, 0x81, 0xb5, 0 };
SEXP a = allocVector(STRSXP, 2);
PROTECT(a);
SET_STRING_ELT(a, 0, mkCharCE(c, CE_NATIVE));
SET_STRING_ELT(a, 1, mkCharCE(c, CE_UTF8));
UNPROTECT(1);
return a;
}
In a UTF-8 locale it doesn't matter:
ginaz:sandbox$ LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 R
> .Call("me")
[1] "ふ" "ふ"
But in any other, let's say SJIS, it does:
ginaz:sandbox$ LANG=ja_JP.SJIS R
> .Call("me")
[1] "縺ｵ" "ふ"
Note that the first string is wrong, because we have supplied UTF-8
encoding but the current one is SJIS. The second one is correct since
we told R that it's UTF-8 encoded.
Finally, if the character cannot be displayed in the given encoding:
ginaz:sandbox$ LANG=en_US.US-ASCII R
> .Call("me")
[1] "\343\201\265" "<U+3075>"
The first one is wrong again, since it's not flagged as UTF8, but the
second one is exactly as expected - unicode 3075 which is the Hiragana
"hu". It doesn't exist in US-ASCII so unicode designation is all you
can display.
All I want to get is just a SEXP object containing the original
utf-8 string, no matter what locale is set currently. Normally what
can I do?
mkChar(X, CE_UTF8);
Cheers,
Simon
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
