Thanks Ben for your tips.
I'm not sure it'll be so easy to do (as the non-feasible regions depend
on the model parameters), but I'm sure it's worth giving a try.
Thanks !!!
Best,
Mathieu
Ben Bolker a écrit :
Mathieu Ribatet <mathieu.ribatet <at> epfl.ch> writes:
Dear list,
I'm currently writing a C code to compute the (composite) likelihood -
well this is done but not really robust. The C code is wrapped in an R
one which call the optimizer routine - optim or nlm. However, the
fitting procedure is far from being robust as the parameter space
depends on the parameter - I have a covariance matrix that should be a
valid one for example.
One reasonably straightforward hack to deal with this is
to add a penalty that is (e.g.) a quadratic function of the
distance from the feasible region, if that is reasonably
straightforward to compute -- that way your function will
get gently pushed back toward the feasible region.
Ben Bolker
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
Institute of Mathematics
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
STAT-IMA-FSB-EPFL, Station 8
CH-1015 Lausanne Switzerland
http://stat.epfl.ch/
Tel: + 41 (0)21 693 7907
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
