>>>>> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:25:38 -0500 (CDT),
>>>>> Terry Therneau (TT) wrote:
> "ESS supported noweb before Sweave existed."
> That is the bit I didn't know. What I was rather looking for was a
noweb
> mode that knows about S formatting, and here it was available all along.
I've
> used a version of ESS for a loooong time - probably should re-read the
> documentation one of these days to catch up on all the new
> features!
> "and the latex
> syntax was added lateron because some people write whole packages using
> noweb and would have had a syntax conflict in their vignettes"
> I'm not quite sure what this means.
Well, you can write your Sweave files also looking like
**********************************************************
This is some latex documentation bla bla bla
And here comes a code chuck:
\begin{Scode}{echo=FALSE,fig=TRUE}
plot(rnorm(100))
\end{Scode}
and here we go again with latex
**********************************************************
and Sweave will process it correctly (if the file has extension
.Rtex). As Sweave does not use noweb's magic <<>>= tags in this case,
you can use those for regular noweb processing. Of course you loose
the nice handling of code chunks by ESS in that case ...
Best,
Fritz
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
