Hi developers,
there is a typo in match.call.Rd; elememt should be element.
Also, the following statement is difficult to understand:
'match.call' does not support with primitive functions (where
argument matching is normally positional).
I suspect that either a noun is missing between support and with, or
with should be removed.
Andrew
--
Andrew Robinson
Department of Mathematics and Statistics Tel: +61-3-8344-6410
University of Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia Fax: +61-3-8344-4599
http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~andrewpr
http://blogs.mbs.edu/fishing-in-the-bay/
Index: src/library/base/man/match.call.Rd
===================================================================
--- src/library/base/man/match.call.Rd (revision 45110)
+++ src/library/base/man/match.call.Rd (working copy)
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
\item To pass most of the call to another function, often
\code{model.frame}. Here the common idiom is that
- \code{expand.dots = FALSE} is used, and the \code{\dots} elememt
+ \code{expand.dots = FALSE} is used, and the \code{\dots} element
of the matched call is removed. An alternative is to
explicitly select the arguments to be passed on, as is done in
\code{lm}.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
