On 27/03/2008, at 11:51 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Yes, the gcc-4.2 is known to be broken for x86_64 as you describe > above (or in fact it miscompiles a few other things, too). > Interestingly llvm-gcc-4.2 suffers from the same problem. That is > the reason why the 64-bit binaries are currently not offered. > Switching to gcc-4.0 breaks other things on other targets, so there > is no universal (and maintainable) solution that I'm aware of.
Perhaps we could all file an enhancement bug request to release an updated version of the compiler. Do Apple know that llvm-gcc is affected? Bill ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
