On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:56 +0100
Gabor Csardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OMG, not again please!
>
> FAQ 7.31.
Yeah, there seems to be a cluster of that type of questions at the
moment.
Perhaps it is time to introduce a global option "HaveReadFAQ7.31" whose
default is "FALSE" but can be changed via the normal mechanism to
"TRUE".
Any comparison of numeric values/vectors should print a warning message
"You are comparing numbers calculated using finite precision
arithmetic, have you read FAQ 7.31." while the value of this option is
FALSE.
Perhaps that will help. :)
Cheers,
Berwin
=========================== Full address =============================
Berwin A Turlach Tel.: +65 6516 4416 (secr)
Dept of Statistics and Applied Probability +65 6516 6650 (self)
Faculty of Science FAX : +65 6872 3919
National University of Singapore
6 Science Drive 2, Blk S16, Level 7 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Singapore 117546 http://www.stat.nus.edu.sg/~statba
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
