On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:56 +0100
Gabor Csardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> OMG, not again please!
> 
> FAQ 7.31.

Yeah, there seems to be a cluster of that type of questions at the
moment.

Perhaps it is time to introduce a global option "HaveReadFAQ7.31" whose
default is "FALSE" but can be changed via the normal mechanism to
"TRUE".

Any comparison of numeric values/vectors should print a warning message
"You are comparing numbers calculated using finite precision
arithmetic, have you read FAQ 7.31."  while the value of this option is
FALSE.  

Perhaps that will help. :)

Cheers,

        Berwin

=========================== Full address =============================
Berwin A Turlach                            Tel.: +65 6516 4416 (secr)
Dept of Statistics and Applied Probability        +65 6516 6650 (self)
Faculty of Science                          FAX : +65 6872 3919       
National University of Singapore     
6 Science Drive 2, Blk S16, Level 7          e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Singapore 117546                    http://www.stat.nus.edu.sg/~statba

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to