Full_Name: Ralf Sommerfeld
Version: 2.3.1
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (193.175.214.49)
The kruskalmc function runs a multiple comparison test after a Kruskal-Wallis
test. I used the function for treatment comparison (default) as compared to a
comparison against a control. The alignment of names and obs.dif is however in
the wrong order!
++++++++++++++
The correct ordering (lines 13-19) is as follows:
for (i in 2:(length(name))) {
for (j in 1:(i-1)) {
vname <- c(vname, paste(name[j], "-", name[i],
sep = ""))
indices <- rbind(indices, c( j, i))
}
}
instead of:
for (i in 1:(length(name) - 1)) {
for (j in (i + 1):length(name)) {
vname <- c(vname, paste(name[i], "-", name[j],
sep = ""))
indices <- rbind(indices, c(i, j))
}
}
+++++++++++++++
I did not check the algorithm for ordering a two-sided or one-sided test against
a control.
All the best,
Ralf
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
