Wouldn't it make programming more error-resistant if vectors were
initialized with missing data, instad of zeroes or ""?
That way, if you assign values to a vector elementwise and you miss some
elements
(because their indices were not selected or because the assignment didn't
work out, see below for code examples)
this would be immediately obvious from the value of the vector elements
themselves
and programming errors would be far less easy to overlook.
e.g.
x <- numeric(n) or
for( i in seq(along = x) )
{
try(x[i] <- function.which.might.crash( args[i] ))
}
or
x <- numeric(n)
x[condition1] <- foo(args1)
x[condition2] <- foo(args2)
...
x[conditionN] <- foo(argsN)
will produce x without any NAs even if function.which.might.crash() actually
did crash during the loop or
if there are indices for which none of conditions 1 to N were true and you
cannot distinguish between zeroes which
are real results and zeroes that remained unchanged since initialization of
the vector.
In a sense, initializing with NAs would also be more consistent with
vector(n, mode = "list"), which produces a list of n NULL-objects.
(numeric(10) is just a wrapper for vector(10, mode="numeric"))
Let me know what you think.
Regards,
Fabian
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
