Just been reading R internals, and noticed a typo (duplicate "should")
- patch attached, and also pasted below:

--- ./doc/manual/R-ints.texi.orig       2007-02-13 10:30:38.000000000 +0000
+++ ./doc/manual/R-ints.texi    2007-03-26 15:25:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
 contain references to environments, which then have enclosing
 environments and so on.  (Environments recognized as package or name
 space environments are saved by name.)  Further, there are `reference
-objects' which are not duplicated on copy and should should remain
+objects' which are not duplicated on copy and should remain
 shared on unserialization.  These are weak references, external pointers
 and environments other than those associated with packages, name spaces
 and the global environment.  These are handled via a hash table, and
--- ./doc/manual/R-ints.texi.orig	2007-02-13 10:30:38.000000000 +0000
+++ ./doc/manual/R-ints.texi	2007-03-26 15:25:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
 contain references to environments, which then have enclosing
 environments and so on.  (Environments recognized as package or name
 space environments are saved by name.)  Further, there are `reference
-objects' which are not duplicated on copy and should should remain
+objects' which are not duplicated on copy and should remain
 shared on unserialization.  These are weak references, external pointers
 and environments other than those associated with packages, name spaces
 and the global environment.  These are handled via a hash table, and
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to