On 1/25/07, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You asked
>
> > (or ultimately the dimension of the generated plot in pixels) without
> > know which of png(), jpeg() or bitmap() was used?
>
> That is determined by arguments 'width' and 'height' in the call to the
> device, and for the first two it is in pixels and for the third it is in
> inches. Internally these are just numbers, and in particular the R
> graphics system does not know the resolution to be used in pixelization.
> Since some graphics parameters assume 'inches' and some 'pixels',
> assumptions have to be made. png() assumes 96dpi and postscript() assumes
> 72dpi.
Thanks. That is useful to know.
>
> You had the information you asked for, so why not just use it?
The function plotting does not know about the device, and I want to be
able to keep fixed-sized margins in the output (assuming bitmap
images).
> R is not claiming to be your keeper.
That is one of the answers I expected and wanted to hear given that it
was the case.
/Henrik
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to infer the dimension of an opened bitmap (png, jpeg,
> > bitmap device...) from par() parmeters. From the help on par(), I
> > found that:
> >
> >> dim <- c(400, 200)
> >> png("foo.png", width=dim[1], height=dim[2])
> >> dim2 <- par("din") * par("cra") / par("cin")
> >> dev.off()
> >> dim2
> > [1] 399.9999 199.9999
> >
> > I've tried the above on Rv2.4.1 on WinXP and Linux with png() and
> > jpeg() and the precision is good enough. However, when I turn to the
> > bitmap() device, I found the following:
> >
> >> s <- 3; # Multiple of 72pt (default value of argument 'res' of bitmap())
> >> res <- s*72;
> >> bitmap("foo.png", width=dim[1]/res, height=dim[2]/res, res=res)
> >> dim2 <- par("din") * par("cra") / par("cin")
> >> dev.off()
> >> dim/dim2
> > [1] 3 3
> >
> > That is, dim/dim2 is not one, but equal to the multiple 's'. I
> > understand that this is because bitmap() is not a device per se and
> > utilized postscript() plus a call to ghostscript. But still, does
> > anyone know if it is possible to infer the correct resolution
> >
> > res2 <- s * par("cra") / par("cin")
> >
> > (or ultimately the dimension of the generated plot in pixels) without
> > know which of png(), jpeg() or bitmap() was used? I know of
> > par("ps"), but its "unit" is device specific.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Henrik
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> >
>
> --
> Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
> University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
> 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
> Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
>
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
