On 1/17/2007 12:53 PM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > Dear R developers, > > just a quick question: I noted that R_ParseVector () has gained an additional > parameter (since SVN rev. 39999). Since R_ParseVector () is part of the > public API, I'm wondering, whether this API change was intentional or not. > Either way is fine with me, but in order to make sure the next release of > RKWard will be compilable with R 2.5.0, I'd like to make sure, whether or not > the change is here to stay.
The change was accidental (I forgot that R_ParseVector was in the API when I made it), but I think it will stay. Setting the value of this parameter to R_NilValue gets the old behaviour. Setting it to some other SEXP will have that SEXP recorded as the srcfile attribute of source references. I think the description above is the level of detail of the implementation that it's safe to work with. The particular format of source references could change. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
