>>>>> "Seth" == Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:33:06 -0700 writes:
Seth> Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think you should use the new DESCRIPTION field and say
>> 'Enhances: rgl'
>>
>> but I haven't checked if this prevents the warning,
>> though I think it should..
Seth> But is Rcmdr enhancing rgl or being enhanced by rgl?
Seth> :-( :-(
I think this distinction is not so easily made on a general level.
I'd say an argument for how you can (should?) think about this
is the following abstraction:
There are two packages, A and B.
A's DESCRIPTION has 'Enhances: B'.
When B is there, A provides extra features.
In one sense, this always enhances B ("enhance" in the usual
English meaning), since B's area of application has been
enlarged by code in A.
Martin
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
