Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I see, thanks. Given that we supply universal binaries (=should > work on all supported archs), we could define mac.binary as macosx/ > universal and mac.binary.xxx as macosx/xxx. The default would still > be mac.binary.
I like this idea. > I'm not sure if we really need separate architecture binaries. The > only benefit I see is that other repositories which don't have the > resources to build binaries for all platforms could provide separate > binaries. On CRAN the other directories are just symlinks to > universal anyway. Any comments on that? Does anyone use the separate > binaries feature? Allowing folks to host an OS X architecture specific binary seems worthwhile, but I don't think CRAN-style repositories should have to have those dirs if they are only hosting universal binaries. Best, + seth ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
