With all due respect, I don't think that the change to the sort function is "a 
good change".  New versions should be backward compatible whenever possible, 
i.e. unless there's a very compelling reason to force large amounts of old code 
to break.  In this case, the sort function could have had an additional 
"unclass" argument with a default value of FALSE.  That way, old code wouldn't 
break and new code could be written with unclass set to TRUE for speed.  I hope 
this will be the case for 2.3.4

_______________________________
Alexander Dannenberg
Geode Capital Management, LLC
53 State Street . Boston . MA . 02109
Tel 617.392.8123  Cell 617.372.6805
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, are intended for us...{{dropped}}

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to