With all due respect, I don't think that the change to the sort function is "a
good change". New versions should be backward compatible whenever possible,
i.e. unless there's a very compelling reason to force large amounts of old code
to break. In this case, the sort function could have had an additional
"unclass" argument with a default value of FALSE. That way, old code wouldn't
break and new code could be written with unclass set to TRUE for speed. I hope
this will be the case for 2.3.4
_______________________________
Alexander Dannenberg
Geode Capital Management, LLC
53 State Street . Boston . MA . 02109
Tel 617.392.8123 Cell 617.372.6805
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, are intended for us...{{dropped}}
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel