I raised this question quite some time ago but it quitly went down the
river. I'll give it a second try (before keeping my modified version of
matplot for ever...):
matplot supports vectors (and/or character strings) for a number of
arguments namely `type', `lty', `lwd', `pch', `col', `cex'. all of them
act consistently in such a way that the first entries are used for plot
of x-column 1 vs. y-column 1 and so forth.
for some reason `bg' is missing from this list (maybe simplyh
forgotten?). this causes an, according to my mind, at least, undesirable
(inconsistent) behaviour in calls like
matplot(x, y, type = 'b', pch = 21:23, col = 2:4, bg = 2:4)
(assuming x, y are 3-column matrices)
`col', `pch' and the other explicit arguments are interpreted on a 'per
plot' basis whereas `bg' is transferred to plot.default and is therefore
interpreted on a 'per point' basis. thus, `col' above sets the colors of
the plotting symbols in the different line plots (say, column 1 to 3)
whereas `bg' sets the colors alternating down each column of the data,
i.e. within each line plot.
question: would'nt it be desirable and more consistent/intuitive if `bg'
where treated on the same footing as the other explicit parameters,
especially if combinations of `pch>=21' and `bg' are envisaged?
necessary changes to matplot are trivial:
3c3
< ..., add = FALSE, verbose = getOption("verbose"))
---
> bg = NULL, ..., add = FALSE, verbose = getOption("verbose"))
75a76,77
> if (length(bg) < k)
> bg <- rep(bg, length.out = k)
81c83,84
< pch = pch[1], col = col[1], cex = cex[1], ...)
---
> pch = pch[1], col = col[1], cex = cex[1], bg = bg[1],
> ...)
85c88
< pch = pch[i], col = col[i], cex = cex[i])
---
> pch = pch[i], col = col[i], cex = cex[i], bg = bg[i])
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
