On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> If it's not dataframes, it will be something else. I think it's highly
> desirable that any(is.na(x)) == anyNA(x) within base packages, and we
> should make it straightforward to maintain this identity in contributed
> packages.
>
> By the way, I think Bill's suggestion of calling it anyMissing makes a
> lot of sense.
>
Here we agree.
-thomas
Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Washington, Seattle
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
